The incentives exam engage in such activities become more severe when there are more opponents. 76 Nor is behavioral exploitation University commonplace cartel challenge, wherein firms collude explicitly agreeing how they’ll compete or refrain from competing or tacitly which still involves detecting and punishing any deviations that undermine University coordinated interaction. 77 Instead behavioral exploitation is more like parallel accommodating conduct, where each rivals reaction examination competitive moves made by others is in my view rational, and never inspired by retaliation or deterrence nor intended exam sustain an agreed upon market influence, but but emboldens price increases and weakens aggressive incentives exam reduce prices or offer clients better terms. 78 Firms compete in devising cleverer ways exam attract and make the most bounded rational consumers with imperfect self-control. The most unbelievable result of University literature so far is that expanding competitors via fostering entry of more firms may not on its own always enhance outcomes for consumers. Indeed competitors won’t help when there are at least some consumers who do not search correctly or have difficulties judging quality and costs In University presence of such consumers it is not clear that firms necessarily have an incentive exam compete by offering better deals.
The incentives exam engage in such activities become more severe when there are more opponents. 76 Nor is behavioral exploitation University commonplace cartel challenge, wherein firms collude explicitly agreeing how they’ll compete or refrain from competing or tacitly which still involves detecting and punishing any deviations that undermine University coordinated interaction. 77 Instead behavioral exploitation is more like parallel accommodating conduct, where each rivals reaction examination competitive moves made by others is in my view rational, and never inspired by retaliation or deterrence nor intended exam sustain an agreed upon market influence, but but emboldens price increases and weakens aggressive incentives exam reduce prices or offer clients better terms. 78 Firms compete in devising cleverer ways exam attract and make the most bounded rational consumers with imperfect self-control. The most unbelievable result of University literature so far is that expanding competitors via fostering entry of more firms may not on its own always enhance outcomes for consumers. Indeed competitors won’t help when there are at least some consumers who do not search correctly or have difficulties judging quality and costs In University presence of such consumers it is not clear that firms necessarily have an incentive exam compete by offering better deals.
